US Economy in Adverse Case of FED.?

The Financial Development Report 2012

Latest FOMC Minutes

World Economic Forum ' Transparency for Inclusive Governance'

Alan Greenspan ' Fiscal Cliff is Painful '

Showing posts with label Crude Oil Futures. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Crude Oil Futures. Show all posts

Monday, August 8, 2011

Stable Prospects For Oil And Gas Companies Reflect The Economy And High Oil Prices



Credit quality for the U.S. oil and gas sector is--and should remain--relatively stable for the remainder of 2011 and into 2012, in Standard & Poor's Ratings Services' view. The ongoing gradual improvement in GDP supports oil prices and could aid natural gas, which accounts for 30% of industrial energy demand, though excess supply will continue to set the direction of natural gas prices. Our 2011 and 2012 forecast for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil of $97.67 and $103.59 per barrel bodes well for exploration and production (E&P) companies with a focus on oil and oilfield services and drilling contract companies. Despite $100 oil, consumers have not cut back much on driving, which has benefited refineries' gasoline and diesel throughput and kept their utilization rates high.

We believe robust oil prices are sustainable throughout the remainder of the year and into 2012, which benefit any producer focused on oil and natural gas liquids. Healthy oil prices, favorable price hedges, and lease requirements that require drilling to hold acreage are helping oilfield and contract drilling companies achieve very strong ratios. We expect E&P companies to keep their capital expenditures high through 2012, thus helping oilfield service companies and drillers maintain healthy credit ratios and earnings.

Economic Outlook


Our latest base-case economic forecast still assumes a weak recovery in 2011 and 2012. Our base-case outlook for the oil and gas industry reflects that assumption and the following expectations: 

  • Real GDP remains moderately positive, with the economy growing 2.4% in 2011 and 2.6% in 2012. However, we can expect to shave off several basis points from our 2.4% estimate for 2011 after the disappointing economic news on July 29. U.S. GDP rose at an annualized rate of just 1.3% in the second quarter, after a downwardly revised 0.4% (originally 1.9%) in the first;
  • Oil prices remain at about $100 per barrel, but below levels that would affect how much people drive and therefore, refinery throughput and margins;
  • Oilfield services and drilling activity stays robust;
  • Healthy capacity utilizations and margins continue for most refiners; and
  • Capital market conditions and interest rates remain favorable.

At Standard & Poor's, we publish monthly our economists' scenario of where we think the U.S. economy could be heading. Beyond projecting GDP and inflation, we also include outlooks for other major economic categories. We call this forecast our "baseline scenario," and we use it in all areas of our credit analyses.
However, we realize that financial market participants also want to know how we think the economy could worsen--or improve--from our baseline scenario. Any point-in-time forecast of the economy will be wrong; it is simply a question of how far wrong. As a result, we now project two additional scenarios, one upside and one downside. These scenarios are set approximately at one standard deviation from the base line (roughly the 20th and 80th percentiles of the distribution of possible outcomes). We use the downside case to estimate the credit effect of an economic outlook that is weaker than our expected case.

Industry Credit Outlook


E&P producers reap the benefits of high oil prices

Several factors continue to support lofty crude prices: steady growth in the global economy, the loss of approximately 1.6 million barrels per day (1.8% of total daily consumption) of Libyan production, political turmoil in other North African countries and the Middle East, temporary North Sea production outages of approximately 400,000 barrels per day, and uncertainties surrounding Saudi Arabia's ability to ramp up additional capacity. Yet supply-demand fundamentals alone don't explain oil prices. The rise has mirrored the declining value of the U.S. dollar, which we expect to remain weak. High prices have benefited E&P producers' cash flows and, as a result, the companies have sought to acquire acreage in the oil and natural gas liquid rich fields, such as the Eagle Ford Shale and Granite Wash.

In sharp contrast, natural gas prices are still weak. Over the past couple of years, the number of natural gas rigs has largely exhibited inelastic behavior to declining prices, and a balancing of supply and demand remains elusive. Production economics and cash costs have taken a back seat to the ongoing need to drill to satisfy held by production (HBP) leases, joint venture agreements, and because of favorable producer hedges. Moreover, a significant backlog of drilled, but not yet completed, wells will continue to put downward pressure on gas prices.

We believe only a decline in supply could trigger an improvement in natural gas prices. Specifically, natural gas prices could increase when:

  • Existing favorable price hedges roll off;
  • Forward strip prices remain consistently below $5 per million cubic feet, which we believe to be an uneconomic threshold for a meaningful amount of production;
  • Drilling declines meaningfully, possibly sometime in the latter half of 2012, due in part to a reduction in drilling to maintain lease acreage (HBP), particularly in the Haynesville shale; and
  • A meaningful number of the drilled, but uncompleted, natural gas wells are completed.

Barring a recession, the confluence of these factors could reestablish the relationship between gas prices and rig count and ultimately lead to a reduction in natural gas inventories, thus increasing prices.

Demand for oilfield services and contract drilling is robust

Higher oil prices also benefit service providers that support oil drilling and production. Moreover, based on preliminary data, E&P capital budgets should be moderately up in 2012, continuing healthy demand for oilfield equipment and services. Land-based drillers, in particular, are benefiting as the drilling boom in liquids-rich shale plays offsets what we believe will be a slow but steady decline in natural gas drilling. With natural gas trading at record discounts relative to oil, we expect drillers to continue shifting to oil or liquids-based drilling (natural gas currently represents approximately 45% of the total rig count).

Offshore drillers face mixed prospects, with nascent signs of increasing demand offset by the specter of newbuild rig deliveries. Although the pace and prospects for tenders remains materially better than in 2010, the impact of scheduled additions to offshore fleets over the next several quarters is a risk in our view. Based on scheduled deliveries, we expect that global jackup and floating rig fleets will increase by approximately 7% and 13%, respectively, by the end of 2012. While we believe the recent trends of increasing dayrates and utilization for jackup rigs will continue over the next couple of years, given E&P companies' spending projections and the moderate nature of planned fleet additions, mid to deepwater floating rigs will likely face greater challenges because of the number of new deliveries coming on line. We expect to see further bifurcation between the segments with newer, higher-specification floating units achieving strong utilization levels and older, lower specification units facing lower utilization and potential declines in dayrates. Permitting activity in the Gulf of Mexico remains slow since the Macondo disaster, and will likely continue slow into 2012. The timing of a sustained recovery in drilling in the Gulf is still uncertain.

Refining and marketing margins should remain solid

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Hurricane warning gives 45% chance of Oil disruption


 Colorado State University's forecasting team on Wednesday maintained its 2011 Atlantic storm season forecast at nine hurricanes, with five of them expected to be major.
The research team, founded by hurricane forecast pioneer William Gray, said the six-month hurricane season which started on June 1 would see 16 tropical storms. That was unchanged from its June 1 projection.
There have been five tropical storms but no hurricanes so far this season, which is now approaching its traditional busy phase from mid-August to October.
"Major" storms are Category 3 or above on the five-step Saffir-Simpson scale of intensity and have top winds of more than 110 miles per hour (177 km per hour).
The CSU team gave a 70 percent probability of a major hurricane making landfall along the U.S. coastline.
There was a 45 percent chance that a major hurricane would make landfall along the U.S. coast of the Gulf of Mexico, where major oil and gas facilities are located, according to the team.

Thursday, July 21, 2011

Crude Oil Uncertain and I.E.A. not to flood oil in Market ....


The IEA Secretariat has completed its 30-day review of the Libya Collective Action launched on 23 June. The review concludes that the Action served a market need by adding liquidity and bridging the gap to additional supplies from OPEC countries. The Secretariat continues to closely monitor market conditions, and the IEA stands ready to augment the Libya Collective Action if market conditions again warrant. While we are not now seeking the release of additional stocks, the Action is not yet complete as stocks are still entering the market. To date, the Libya Collective Action involves just over 2.5% of public and industry obligated stocks.

On 23 June, the IEA announced a release of 60 million barrels of oil in response to the ongoing supply disruption of Libyan light sweet crude, an anticipated oil demand increase in the third quarter, and to act as a bridge to incremental supplies from major producers. Market appetite for the government stocks made available has been greater than during the Hurricane Katrina Collective Action in 2005, and the measure has largely achieved its aims to date.

The provision of extra supplies of crude, notably light-sweet crude from the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve, and products has had a number of beneficial impacts in the market. Sweet-sour crude differentials have narrowed overall, rendering light-sweet crudes more economic for refiners at a time of peak transport fuel demand. Tightness in prompt supply for light sweet crudes has diminished. Refining margins, notably upgrading margins, have improved, thus reducing the danger that suppressed refinery activity levels over the summer would lead to a products-driven supply crunch later in the year.

The IEA also notes a sharp rise in OPEC oil production. IEA estimates put June OPEC crude production at 30.03 mb/d, a rise of 840 kb/d from May, and a possible further rise of 150 – 200 kb/d in July. The IEA estimates that higher OPEC production and the Libya Collective Action should substantially cover the expected 1.3 mb/d increase in the 3Q11 ‘call on OPEC crude and stock change’. However, a number of uncertainties remain which demand vigilance, notably the duration of the Libyan disruption, the future evolution of OPEC supply as well as the final impact of the stock release itself; much of the oil is only now entering the physical market.

The Secretariat has encouraged member governments to allow industry the maximum of flexibility in replenishing stocks, preferably waiting until year-end or beyond. Given that the action has not required any country to drop below the 90-day net-import requirement, the timing and pace of any replenishment are unlikely to be disruptive to the market.

Stock release review – July 21, 2011

Frequently asked questions



Q: A month in to the IEA stock release, with crude prices above pre-release levels, how would you evaluate the success of that action?
A: The action aimed to add short-term liquidity to a global market which has lost nearly 1.5 mb/d of Libyan supply and faces a seasonal rise in demand in the third quarter. The release from the US SPR has allowed alternative light-sweet cargoes to divert to demand centres in Europe and Asia. Refining margins, though still volatile and weak on an historical basis, have nonetheless strengthened. And market structure is more conducive to normal 3Q industry stockbuilds than it was prior to the action. Finally, it should be noted that market appetite for the government stocks made available has been greater than during the Hurricane Katrina Collective Action in 2005, and the measure has largely achieved its aims to date.
Q: Last week the OMR projected even greater tightening in the third quarter. Wouldn’t this argue in favour of extending the stock release for another 30 days?
The OMR of last week indeed foresaw an increased ‘call on OPEC crude and stock change’ for 3Q11 compared to previous issues. Gratifyingly, however, there were already signs in June that key OPEC producers are raising production significantly to help meet that rising ‘call’. In addition, the OMR reviewed industry stock levels at the end of June. As the action was announced on 23 June, none of the government stocks had entered the market yet. These stocks, some 38 mb, or 610 kb/d, will augment  July and notably August supplies from other sources,  and reducing the potential for a further tightening of the market.
Q: Why has it taken so long for oil from the release, notably in the US, to be made available to the market?
A: There are different stages in a release process, starting from the publication of tender documents (in the US on the very day of the announced action) to the actual delivery of the oil at a pipeline or ship a few weeks later. For the market the most important moment is the awarding of the bids, as from then on companies can schedule these deliveries into their supplies. In the US the awarding of bids started on Friday 1 July. These supplies are available close to trading and refining hubs and don’t need to be shipped over long distances.
Q: What is the envisaged time line for replenishing stocks after the release?
A: That is very much up to the provisions for replenishment legislated for individual member countries. With that said, the Secretariat has recommended to member governments to allow industry the maximum of flexibility in replenishing stocks, preferably waiting until the end of the year or beyond. Given that the action has not required any country to drop below the 90-day net-import requirement, the timing and pace of any replenishment are unlikely to be disruptive to the market.
Q: Brent has flipped back in to backwardation recently. Is that indicative of a successful stock release?
A: Despite recent developments, the prompt premium in the market has nonetheless weakened from where it was earlier in June. Rather than focusing on day-to-day or week-to-week fluctuations in prices, the IEA collective action will be judged ultimately by whether or not it gave refiners and market participants flexibility and added liquidity early in 3Q. We are encouraged to see incremental OPEC supplies now being made available and the IEA stock release needs to be seen in concert with that in helping ensure adequately supplied markets.
Q: Is it true that the IEA did not extend the release because member countries were opposed?
A: No, the decision not to seek an additional release for now was based on an updated assessment of current market fundamentals and the extent to which already committed increases in supply will play out over the coming months. So the premise of the question is not correct.
As part of the Collective Action process that was launched on 23 June, the Secretariat undertook a review of the action and assessed its market impact. The Secretariat concluded that the Action served a market need by adding liquidity and bridging the gap to additional supplies from OPEC countries. However, we also pointed out that there are a number of uncertainties in the current market situation requiring vigilance. This conclusion was communicated to member countries on 20 July and no country asked for an additional collective release. The Secretariat continues to closely monitor market conditions, and the IEA stands ready to augment the Libya Collective Action if market conditions again warrant.