I.
|
A. CRUDE OIL PRODUCTION – PERFORMANCE
| |
Month / Period
|
Planned Target (MMT)
|
Actual Production (MMT)
|
%age achievement
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) Vis-à-vis target (%age)
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) over last year (%age)
| |
|
|
June, 2011*
|
3.145
|
3.166
|
100.7
|
0.7
|
7.7
| |
April-June, 2011*
|
9.404
|
9.581
|
101.9
|
1.9
|
9.5
| |
April-June, 2010
|
|
8.753
|
|
|
| |
MMT: Million MetricTonnes.
|
|
|
|
*: Provisional.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
B. COMPANY-WISE ACHIEVEMENT
|
|
|
| |
Company / State
|
Planned Target (MMT)
|
Actual Production (MMT)
|
%age achievement
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) (%age)
| |
ONGC
|
1.9420
|
1.9720
|
101.5
|
1.5
| |
Gujarat
|
0.4410
|
0.4720
|
107.0
|
| |
Andhra Pradesh
|
0.0220
|
0.0250
|
113.6
|
| |
Tamil Nadu
|
0.0160
|
0.0210
|
131.3
|
| |
Assam
|
0.0920
|
0.0980
|
106.5
|
| |
Mumbai Region (inclMumbai High)
|
1.3700
|
1.3560
|
99.0
|
| |
OIL
|
0.3069
|
0.3158
|
102.9
|
2.9
| |
Assam
|
0.3050
|
0.3136
|
102.8
|
| |
Arunachal Pradesh
|
0.0019
|
0.0023
|
121.5
|
| |
PRIVATE/JVC
|
0.8958
|
0.8778
|
98.0
|
-2.0
| |
TOTAL
|
3.1447
|
3.1657
|
100.7
|
0.7
| |
| |
C. REASONS FOR SHORTFALL
| |
Company / State
|
Reasons for shortfall
| |
ONGC (Mumbai High Offshore)
|
·Less than anticipated oil gain from side track and development wells. Production affected due to high GOR/high water cut from Vasai East. Less line condensate receipt from offshore.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A statement showing Crude Oil Production during June, 2011 and cumulatively for the period April- June, 2011 vis-à-vis 2010-11 planned production is at Annexure-I.
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
II. A. REFINERY PRODUCTION
| |
(IN TERMS OF CRUDE THROUGHPUT)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Month / Period
|
Planned Target (MMT)
|
Actual Production (MMT)
|
%age achievement
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) Vis-à-vis target (in %age)
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) over last year (in %age)
| |
June, 2011*
|
13.07
|
14.14
|
108.1
|
8.1
|
4.7
| |
April- June, 2011*
|
40.42
|
42.53
|
105.2
|
5.2
|
5.3
| |
April- June, 2010
|
|
40.39
|
|
|
| |
*: Provisional.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The crude throughput in IOC ( Barauni, Haldia, Koyali & Mathura), BPCL (Mumbai), HPCL (Visakh), NRL (Numaligarh), MRPL (Mangalore), ONGC (Tatipaka) & RIL (Jamnagar) refineries have exceeded their planned target.
| |
The crude throughput in IOC (Guwahati, Digboi, Bongaigaon & Panipat), BPCL (Kochi), HPCL(Mumbai), CPCL (Narimanam(CBR) & Manali), & EOL (Vadinar) refineries was less than their planned target.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
B. REASONS FOR SHORTFALL :
| |
| |
Company / State
|
Reasons for shortfall
| |
IOCL, Guwahati
|
● Restricted throughput on account of emergency shutdown of Coking unit for high pressure drop of furnace.
| |
IOCL, Digboi
|
● In-line with Assam crude availability.
| |
IOCL,Bongaigaon
|
● In-line with Ravva crude availability.
| |
IOCL, Panipat
|
● Restricted throughput on account of emergency shutdown of Hydrocracker unit (for catalyst change).
| |
| |
A statement showing refinery-wise production during the month of June, 2011 and cumulatively for the period April- June, 2011 vis-à-vis 2010-11 planned target is at Annexure-II.
| |
|
| |
III. REFINERY CAPACITY UTILISATION [excluding RPL(SEZ)]
| |
| |
Month
|
Utilisation (%)
|
Period
|
Utilisation(%)
| |
June, 2011*
|
114.0
|
April- June, 2011
|
113.0
| |
June, 2010
|
105.7
|
April- June, 2010
|
104.3
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
IV. A. NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION
| |
| |
Month / Period
|
Planned Target (MCM)
|
Actual Production (MCM)
|
%age achieve-ment
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) Vis-à-vis target (%age)
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) over last year (%age)
| |
June, 2011*
|
4160.5
|
3975.0
|
95.5
|
-4.5
|
-11.7
| |
April- June, 2011*
|
12452.1
|
12215.0
|
98.1
|
-1.9
|
-10.2
| |
April- June, 2010
|
|
13604.1
|
|
|
| |
MCM: Million Cubic Metres.
|
|
*: Provisional.
|
|
| |
| |
B. COMPANY-WISE ACHIEVEMENT
| |
| |
Company / State
|
Planned Target (MCM)
|
Actual Production (MCM)
|
%age achievement
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) (%age)
| |
ONGC
|
1836.3
|
1838.6
|
100.1
|
0.1
| |
Gujarat
|
145.3
|
153.3
|
105.5
|
| |
Rajasthan
|
1.0
|
1.5
|
143.4
|
| |
Andhra Pradesh
|
103.5
|
108.9
|
105.2
|
| |
Tamil Nadu
|
102.9
|
106.3
|
103.3
|
| |
Assam
|
38.7
|
40.5
|
104.5
|
| |
Tripura
|
46.1
|
52.7
|
114.4
|
| |
Mumbai High Offshore
|
1398.8
|
1375.5
|
98.3
|
| |
OIL
|
218.4
|
210.3
|
96.3
|
-3.7
| |
Assam
|
197.6
|
189.2
|
95.7
|
| |
Arunachal Pradesh
|
1.6
|
1.5
|
96.8
|
| |
Rajasthan
|
19.2
|
19.5
|
101.7
|
| |
PRIVATE/JVC
|
2105.8
|
1926.1
|
91.5
|
-8.5
| |
Onshore $
|
60.6
|
60.0
|
99.0
|
| |
Offshore
|
2045.2
|
1866.1
|
91.2
|
| |
TOTAL
|
4160.5
|
3975.0
|
95.5
|
-4.5
| |
$: Including Coal Bed Methane production.
| |
| |
C. REASONS FOR SHORTFALL
| |
Company / State
|
Reasons for shortfall
| |
ONGC (Mumbai High Offshore)
|
· Less by down steam consumers i.e. RCF & MSEB affected production. Closure of wells due to revamping of HP sep-A (under NHRC project).
| |
OIL (Assam)
|
· Less gas production and sale in Assam due to default in upliftment by customer.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment